Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GenWATT Solar Energy Solutions (Philippines)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

GenWATT Solar Energy Solutions (Philippines)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet WP:NCORP. Current sources are all primary, from their website, facebook pages or youtube channels. I couldn't see any other good sources on google. Pahunkat (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Pahunkat (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like the original author wanted to voice his opposition to removal at the article's talk page - . Best, Tymon. r  Do you have any questions?  02:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Adriem915 The sources have now secondary sources, a link from the official Department of Trade and Industry Business Name portal. Please don't remove the article. Added new newspaper on the sources. Hope that you did not delete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriem915 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable company, likely a connected editor. ST47 (talk) 04:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk: Adriem915 It is a notable company, Did you know that the founder and some members of its board is a active government employee or retired government employee. I am not connected to the company, I am the maker of the page. It is a solar energy company, provides solar energy system in the philippines. It is notable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriem915 (talk • contribs) 08:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk: Adriem915 It is a company in the philippines. Please don't delete the article. Please. Please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriem915 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Random User: Aside from a solar company. They provide energy news. On their official website. So I will add it. It is a notable company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.101.168 (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk: Adriem915 @ST47 What are you saying? I am not a connected editor and it is a notable company, to know if it is a notable company make sure to have some wikipedia editors living in the philippines, like me. So I know if it is a notable company. @Pahunkat What are you saying that you can't find good sources on google, I can find a lot of them, don't believe me? I will say them all: Official Page, Youtube, Facebook, DTI Permit. That are good sources, especially the DTI Permit. DTI is actually Department of Trade and Industry.
 * Department of Trade and Industry is an example of trivial coverage. It's just a listing on a government website saying the company exists. That doesn't help with notability. The company's website, youtube and facebook pages are all examples of WP:PRIMARY coverage - they are generated by the company themselves. That doesn't help with notability either. Pahunkat (talk) 09:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriem915 (talk • contribs) 09:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Random User: Is Department of Trade and Industry's portal useless and only for trivial purposes? Of course not, it can be a source of information as Primary in category. Do you know that genwatt india is having a counterpart in the philippines, it is the article that Adriem915 created, he pushes a lot of time creating it and you will just delete it, is it possible to move it either to draft instead of deleting it. Because Adriem915, put a lot of time to the article. Can yoy just move it to draft not to delete it or much better for me to retain it into the mainspace. I know you are wanting to deleting the page, if you decided to delete it, instead move the page to draft space. Because Adriem915 uses his mind and energy to create the page. Please If possible at least to retain the article or move it to draft. That is my suggestion. I know all of you, except me and Adriem915 wanted to delete/remove the page. Hope that you atleast move it to draft or better retain it. Also Adriem915, provided a quality source on here.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.83.101.168 (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)  SOCKSTRIKE  Java  Hurricane  07:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

User talk: Adriem915 124.83.101.168 is right, I spend a lot of time, creating the article, If possible move it to draft or retain it. I also make a backup of the code of the article, in case something happens. If it is deleted, I am thinking of getting this article in again on wikipedia since I backupped the code. Actually, I am so sad because my hardwork will be removed, I am trying to improve it. I will be too sad and might depressed if the article has been removed. Hope that you did not make me depressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adriem915 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NCORP, also possibly a candidate for A7 and G11. I cannot see any claim of significance, and the stub reads more like an advert  Java  Hurricane  04:36, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As it stands with no references, a candidate for speedy. Certainly fails NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Per WP:G11. Article easily fails WP:NCORP. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and no reliable sources found, completely fails WP:NCORP. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 11:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.