Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender/Feminist archaeology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Gender/Feminist archaeology
Though I can see the worth of having the articles gender archaeology and Feminist archaeology, and usually have no complaints about disambiguation pages, this one... well, why do we have it? Do we need it? I'd say we don't, and this can be quite safely deleted. Grutness...wha?  04:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no one in their right mind would search for this title, so as a disambig it fails, and it doesn't have any independent content. Opabinia regalis 04:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Disambigs are usually for articles with similar titles, not similar content.-- TBC Φ  talk?  06:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indeed I can't think of a reason to keep it. Actually, shouldn't Feminist archaeology and gender archaeology rather be merged? Stammer 10:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is little more than a disambig right now; nothing links to it and it is unlikely anything will. I tend to agree that feminist archaeology should be merged to gender archaeology also. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless disambig --Steve 23:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.