Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender and Mine Action Programme (GMAP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Gender and Mine Action Programme (GMAP)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources given that mention the organization, none found via Google News (including the Swiss edition). Does not appear to be notable. Huon (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I'd prefer to vote Keep as this is a worthy group and worthy cause. Unfortunately the rules of Wikipedia require sources independent of the topic that discuss the topic in depth (WP:GNG)) and the sources found are either connected to the topic, trivial mentions or things like this (blog post by an intern) or this  (resource list). No in-depth profile of GMAP in a magazine or newspaper for example. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I'd prefer to vote Keep as this is a worthy group and doing remarkable stuff. --VI-007 (talk) 16:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Non-notable. Noteworthy yes, notable no. Caffeyw (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.