Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender identity movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:27, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Gender identity movement

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article should be kept in the user's sandbox per their edit summary. Additionally, the content should be included in the Gender identity article rather than a standalone page. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced POV stub. Funcrunch (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This article will outline the social forces behind the spread of gender identity ideology and the movements that oppose it. This is quite different to the gender identity article, which revolves around the concepts rather than the social forces that favour or oppose the various concepts. Nero Calatrava (talk) 17:57, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, then I would strongly suggest either creating an article in your sandbox or Draft:Gender identity movement. Articles that are not completed should not be published. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would strongly advise you to start creating an article in the draftspace linked in my comment above. Start with finding some sources and build from there. Cheers. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per . Santacruz  &#8258;  Please ping me!  18:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. Unsourced micro-stub that fails WP:NPOV. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete POV barely-a-stub – as suggests, maybe you could work on this as a draft, but I would caution against trying to use Wikipedia as a soapbox, as your previous edits on gender-related articles suggest you are doing. ClaudineChionh (talk – contribs) 02:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced POV stub (POVFORK?). -sche (talk) 02:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV fork of Gender identity and possibly Anti-gender movement. --Aquillion (talk) 04:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as a POV content fork. Without even seeing the !votes, I knew exactly what cruft would be in here, and the page did not disappoint. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 06:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, salt and do not bother recreating the article is WP:UGLY, yes, but it’s also an obvious attempt at a transphobic POV fork, and that’s not going to pass even if it’s cleaned up. The proper term for the so-called “gender identity movement” is the transgender rights movement. Calling it something else is usually meant as a dogwhistle. Every single one of this user’s edits has been related to POV pushing on transgender-related subjects so this is clearly not a good faith misunderstanding. Dronebogus (talk) 06:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I think you're conflating the two topics too much, but I do agree that it is likely not a good faith misunderstanding. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 16:02, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the POV-related arguments above. WikiJoeB (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this article should have never been created. Catfurball (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete There's nothing salvageable here. There's very little to say about it that hasn't already been said if only because there's just that little there to say anything about. Looking at the votes above I think a SNOW close may be in order here.--Licks-rocks (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the POV-related arguments above. Nero Calatrava (talk) 23:08, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.