Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender marketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With no prejudice towards recreation as a properly sourced article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Gender marketing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced non-neutral opinion piece that cannot readily be fixed. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Blow it up and start over. The topic is notable, but this is just a how-to guide for marketers. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Agree with Robert & Clarityfiend, as it stands now, it's a rather classic example of WP:TNT. Delete Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT. A real, neutral and properly referenced article could almost certainly be written about this topic — but that's not what this article is. (For just one example of the many problems here, properly written Wikipedia articles do not address the reader as "you".) Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.