Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeneRally


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. TravellingCari 22:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

GeneRally

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not explain where the game has received any substantial coverage from reliable sources. Tagged with this notability concern since February. Prod removed in July with the rationale "It's notable." with no further explaination how. The name "generally" makes checking for sources through a search engine a little tricky, narrows it down a little but the results are largly directory entries, forums and blogs; can't see anything to satisfty WP:N guidelines. Marasmusine (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 15:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as even I couldn't find any reliable sources, either. User who contested the prod should have tried to find sources him/herself and not claim that it's notable and point at others to find sources. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as notabiity cannot be found inWP:RS.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:04, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Failed to find sources when I had a look yesterday, notability is asserted by sources, not claims that they exist. Shame, it's an interesting looking game. Someoneanother 12:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.