Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Domagala


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  17:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Gene Domagala

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable. Minor Toronto citizen who has done some charity work. Doesn't meet criteria for Wikipedia notability. Recommend delete. Suttungr (talk) 22:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Suttungr (talk) 00:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Yeah, no...nothing here suggests a person who belongs in Wikipedia for any reason that would satisfy our inclusion rules. As well, two of the four sources are primary, and one of the remaining two is a neighbourhood weekly community newspaper that isn't widely distributed enough to count toward getting a person over WP:GNG — leaving the Toronto Star as the only valid source, but one article in a major newspaper isn't enough to get a person into Wikipedia by itself if you're shooting for "notable because coverage exists" instead of "notable because he passes inclusion criterion X, Y or Z". If this were Torontopedia I might let it slide, but nothing here suggests that he warrants inclusion in an international encyclopedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I feel like this article could have just been speedily deleted. There is nothing here to warrant an article. He is a local well-liked person, but he has not done anything of note (from what we can see here). --Cagepanes (talk) 02:22, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   12:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  02:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and above editors. Search provided no basis for meeting notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:49, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.