Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Hunt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Procedural close. This is a faulty bot listing (the bot isn't faulty, but the listing is) - the article in question is already being discussed at Articles for deletion/Sam Tyler. Further comments should be at that AfD discussion.' Grutness...wha? '' 23:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Fix header. D ARTH P ANDA duel 02:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Gene Hunt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Establishes no claim to notability for this character, and does not provide substantial third-party references to establish notability. This character isn't widely documented or studied in the arts, and therefore is not notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article. Mikeblas (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC) Strong keep - Loads of media publications have Gene Hunt in it, everyone knows of the actor Philip Glenister who plays the character, the amount of books, media publications and TV he has been on clearly shows its notable. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 09:41, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an article about a principle character in an internationally broadcast television drama; it is absurd to suggest that it isn't notable because it "isn't studied in the arts". As the drama series has its own project notability isn't in question. Numerous other Wikipedia article also link to this article. Article is well referenced, and should not have been nominated, this is just tying up AFD time.andi064 T . C 09:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as per Andi064 (Quentin X (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC))
 * Keep: See my comment on the Tyler page. Ryan 4314   (talk) 14:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.