Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genebandhu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Genebandhu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seams to be non-notable. I can't find reliable sources. There is some coverage (like ), but is seams to be about different organization (http://www.genebandhu.org/ rather than http://genebandhu.in/).  Vanjagenije  (talk)  18:54, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * delete promotional page created about an organization that fails GNG. Jytdog (talk) 08:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This recently-created article is in poor shape itself and is pretty incoherent, with only three self-published sources, none of which are attached inline. The websites have a very different appearance but both give the same postal address in New Dehli. They article in the Economic Times in August 2015 covering a proposed social initiative is interesting, although there aren't any details about the numbers of people that actually participated. Their website was cited in an article published in the Asian Journal of Transfusion Science in 2015, although they are not named. I can't see that notability has been demonstrated when judged against WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.