Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Laws of Massachusetts

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE WITH Massachusetts General Law AND KEEP. Stormie 10:28, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

General Laws of Massachusetts
duplicated information, perm substub merged back into main Massachusetts article. Evil Monkey &rarr; Talk 06:12, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete minor unnecessary stub, now that its merged this can go  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 06:15, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. The content should be merged and redirected to Massachusetts General Law since that's the official and most commonly used name. I think the proper response here is to de-orphan the page, not delete an article which is obviously not a VfD candidate. Rhobite 06:16, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Both articles contain the same content as the main Massachusetts article subsection on law (which is where the 2 lines worth keeping belong anyways). If at some later point someone decides to write up something worth keeping here, there is nothing stopping them from being recreated.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 06:23, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep this article and let grow. Martg76 19:53, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge/redirect Massachusetts General Law into this. Even as a stub, it's worth keeping and there is potential for expansion. There are more than a few quirks and peculiarilites in MA law that would be worth describing in more detail. older &ne; wiser 01:10, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)