Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Luna (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 07:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

General Luna (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:BAND  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a recreation of a previous WP:CSD that was recreated without improvement. The CSD tag was removed and some article improvement was made with no reliable third-party sources provided for the improvement. A PROD was added along with primary sources and ref improve tags but they were removed by the article's creator. It fails WP:BAND because the band has not "been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable". The editor, who declined the CSD, stated on the talkpage that the group may have charted. However, as per the words above the criteria, an "ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.)" may be notable. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and this group's notability is not established. --moreno oso (talk) 15:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Some coverage of the band exists, which I identified on the article's talk page. It isn't enough to be convincing evidence of notability, but could contribute towards it if more can be found.--Michig (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. Poorly sourced band article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article as one reference from the Manila Bulletin. There are also articles from the Philippine Daily Inquirer and Philstar. -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.