Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Pissedness Factor (GPF)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

General Pissedness Factor (GPF)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Apparently made up term, with zero Google hits. Saligron 01:02, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete Absolute nonsense, surely? DannyDoodles 07:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Author of the page also tried redirecting GPF to this term. Trebor 01:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. eaolson 01:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Standard by what... um, standard?  Neologism by and large. --Dennisthe2 01:55, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article seems to have been created in an environment characterized by a GPF of 8.6 and thus is in violation of WP:CIVIL. But seriously, delete per WP:HOAX.  -- Black Falcon 02:27, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Turgidson 03:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody. Cedlaod 04:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious hoax. --Haemo 04:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete nonsense. Alex43223Talk 05:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete rubbish - Skysmith 14:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above.  Tcpe  k  i  n  14:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe if this was the scale of "pissedness" in regards to level of intoxication, it might have been suitable for BJAODN; but as this stands, it isn't even worth that much. Agent 86 19:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and speedy close. I refuse to believe that utter crap and nonsense such as this must be forced through the full 5 days.  Chris cheese whine 22:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - so tagged. Come on, this is clearly patent nonsense and complete bollocks. Moreschi Request a recording? 22:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.