Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation 9/11


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Generation Z. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Generation 9/11

 * – ( View AfD View log )

An orphan article since February 2009. Contains very limited content, virtually no sources and fails to assert notability. The subject itself could also very well be covered/merged with Generation Z. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 09:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with Generation Z. Has no references and has been largely untouched for a couple of years. But, the term "Generation 9/11" does result in over 3 million hits on Google, so it probably has sufficient notability.  Uncensored Kiwi  Kiss 09:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The article is a pitful, unreferenced stub, but hundreds of Google book hits and a cursory review of the top ones suggests notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Redirect to Generation Z, which is more a common term used for the subject. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 03:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.