Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis Be


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Genesis Be

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod. Genesis Be fails WP:BIO; there is a lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources to assert her notability. The references present in the article are either blogs, dead links, or don't mention the subject at all. — ξ xplicit  01:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Pyrajenn: I've removed or replaced dead links or links that do not mention subject at all. I've also deleted statements that may be deemed subjective or promoting the subject rather than have a neutral tone. Please review again and offer any other corrections that may need to be done in order to make the page valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrajenn (talk • contribs) 01:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 16:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.