Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis Davila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Well I'm gonna close this as "per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes." seeing as the nom hasen't responded and plus sources have been found- If the disagrees I'll relist. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:37, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Genesis Davila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No one has been able to provide sources for anything in this article created by banned Socks. Clearly fails WP:NMODEL if editors can't prove she exists. Legacypac (talk) 09:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Her existence is easy to verify through findsources. That said, I don't see that she meets gng. A Spanish speaker might be better qualified to answer that question. Jacona (talk) 10:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

scrolling through the edits her name, birthdate, and height have all been changed without any inline cites. Who knows what is correct or incorrect here. Legacypac (talk) 10:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

If there is any possible proposal of redirect, you can share one. Finding sources in English language is actually difficult for this subject. Noteswork (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Looks like she is notable. Sources in Spanish:          In English:  &mdash;Ahnoneemoos (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.