Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genesis Transport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (and even he's on the fence) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Genesis Transport

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability of company has not been established; sources provided establish existence, but not notability. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources given appear to establish notability. This, this, this and this are all significant coverage, and while the first three relate to the same event, the fourth is more directly about the company itself. Taken together they look like enough to me. Alzarian16 (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I somehow did not see that fourth link, which I believe does help establish notablity; however it is the only one of the four that  is actually "about" the company (the rest, in my opinion, essentially just identify the company's service as the location of a crime).  I still believe that this does not rise to the necessary level of "significant coverage" required by the general notability guidelines, but I'm hoping we can get more comments.  Qwyrxian (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. The third party coverage is non-trivial and sufficient to meet WP:COMPANY and WP:GNG. What sort of news coverage does one expect a bus company to generate?  The cited references confirm they are one of the largest bus operators in the Philippines, as are competitors listed in this article who have their own articles.  This one is an obvious keep. patsw (talk) 00:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.