Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetic Halfling

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:44, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Genetic Halfling
Appears to be original research. Googling the term "genetic halfling" resulted in zero matches, it is unlikely to be an accepted term under those circumstances. C HAIRBOY (☎) 14:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Comment I hesitate to say delete -- some times there are real technical terms that I can't find on google myself, so I'm not sure this should be deleted until someone that knows Biology well can confirm that this isn't a real term. --Quasipalm 17:57, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; I recall that scientists are not even certain whether humans and neanderthals ever cross-bred, so this appears to be totally original "research". Perhaps it was meant to be relevant to Homo floresiensis? Otherwise it just looks like semi-gamer crud, with a link on the halfling page. &mdash; RJH 18:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless use of the word is sourced someplace not-crazy. Sdedeo 18:23, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - looks ORish. Shimgray 12:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Crossbreeding between neandertals and homo sapiens sapiens is at least controversial. It should not be presented as fact. The reality of genetic halflings itself seems doubtful. Not grounds for deletion as such, of course, but unless some supporting information can be found, I'd say delete this as an invention.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.