Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genetic poverty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:40, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Genetic poverty

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Personal theory witch goes from Human health to Botany to Economics, unsourced. Couldn't find any source for this. Per WP:RS and WP:NOT. A CSD was declined Ben Ben (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ben Ben (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Ipsign (talk) 12:00, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no biological theory to this either in textbooks or on the web. Worse, the term has derogatory connotations as in poor benighted people in so-called g.p. Speedy deletion is right. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. I think that the CSD should have been accepted on WP:NONSENSE grounds: "2. Content that, while apparently intended to mean something, is so confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it. If the meaning cannot be identified, it is impossible to accurately copy-edit the text." (emphasis added) Completely unsourced. Anyway, to the miniscule extent that this phrase seems to exist, it mostly seems to refer to a lack of genetic diversity within a species or ecosystem, which I don't think is what the author meant, but who can tell? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:21, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsourced original research. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clear-cut case of WP:OR.--JayJasper (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.