Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneva Water Hub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" opinion by the article creator, who is employed by the article subject, does not address the lack of notability as reflected in reliable third-party sources, see WP:GNG.  Sandstein  12:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Geneva Water Hub

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article written by the Communications Officer of the Geneva Water Hub; no sources other than its own and associated websites. Promotional COI article. Pam D  18:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Searches turn in nothing to add meaningful sources, and fails GNG and NCORP. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not a particularly notable subject, unlikely that more verifiable sources will turn up. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH as a result.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: My objective is in no way to promote or advertise the, more than an organization, Initiative I work for but to inform the community and general audience about this process, also Secretariat of the Global High-Level Panel on Water and Peace, in favour of water and peace, globally. I have been very careful to follow the Wikipedia 5 pillars in all of my content writing. The reliability of source has particularly been at my attention, and the diversity of them will grow in the coming weeks. Regarding my involvement with the Initiative, I am taking care to comply with the Wikipedia: Plain and simple conflict of interest guide as best as possible, be transparent and completely neutral. I hope that you will understand that I am new to the Wikipedia philosophy and how to put it into practice (technically). I am ready to follow concrete piece of advice to make the Geneva Water Hub article acceptable.--Stephanekluser (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.