Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneva Water Hub (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  11:32, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Geneva Water Hub
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure promotion of their activities. The references mostly are either from them, or are general treatments of the problems they hope to solve. Material emphasising how important the need is for the work of a charity or foundation is how they raise money, not encyclopedic content.  DGG ( talk ) 04:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

The article has been significantly modified and shortened to remove promotional material and provide clearer referencing for existing achievements rather than future aims. Further clarity has been given the promotion of their identity as an academic institution rather than the misinterpreted suggestion of charity or foundation --Trennez (talk) 12:33, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 05:13, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  16:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment This appears to be a small project of 4 universities, not a general international producject.The largest section, section 1.1, still talks about general importance of the problem, rather than the organization. The references for the other material are either PR or mere notices.  DGG ( talk ) 22:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 22:37, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.