Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geneviève Castrée


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. 0 votes in three weeks - no objections for re-nomination later JForget  00:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Geneviève Castrée

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested Prod, no sources, notability in question, looks better as a list. &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 15:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Lots of hits under her own name, and "woelv" and "Ô PAON" which she also records under.  Don't know if any are suitably reputable, though.  Lots of blogs, download sites, etc.  there's  and ...  David V Houston (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I am the page creator.  While I agree that more citation is needed, especially for the biographical material--and I have been meaning to add these--I really don't think notability should be in question, considering the artist's 2 releases on one of the most important and influential music labels (K Records) and several of the world's premier art comics anthologies (Kramers Ergot. Drawn & Quarterly).   Charmingtedious (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability is not inherited. -- &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 00:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

While indeed "notability is not inherited", the critierion for notability has clearly been met. In the category of musicians: "Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable" and "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." Also, To my understanding, BLP in itself is not a rationale for deletion. You are going to need to articulate what, precisely, your objection is. 174.31.154.120 (talk) 11:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC)