Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevra, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Genevra, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

GUdde and Durham seem to disagree a bit about the naming of the post office, and some topos show both "Berlin" and "Genevra Station", but the topos show nothing but station buildings, one of which is apparently still there. It has been incorporated int a huge Archer Daniels Midland rice mill. Community? No. Mangoe (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep. Guess what, Berlin had a post office.  Searching newspapers.com yields trivial coverage:, which states there was a townsite there and , which states that one of the heirs lived at Berlin, Colusa County,  states that someone could sew sacks.  GBooks yield Gudde, which I added to the article.  Most of the other GBook references are to the station, which means that WP:STATION cold be in play here. Others differ as to whether the a post office is a legal recognition, I feel that it is, which meets #1 of WP:GEOLAND.  The coverage seems fairly trivial, though there is one short newspaper article about the name change.  I don't feel that #2 of WP:GEOLAND is met. Cxbrx (talk) 05:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough sources to show notability for an article.--Blurz (talk) 02:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.