Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genius Inside (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Genius Inside
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY. Has a few links but they seem to be insufficient trivial coverage from non reliable secondary sources. Hu12 (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  02:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:25, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment The previous reference links are largely dead wood, except for an article by the company principal (primary) and a vendor catalogue listing (mundane). The most recent evidence for the company's ongoing activity that I can find is this feedback/review and this presentation of their SaaS offering (primary) in 2012. AllyD (talk) 09:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete What makes this notable? --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The previous AfD seems to have turned on whether the 2008 IBM Lotus Award Best Mid-Market Solution conferred notability. IBM's pages on these 2008 awards are now dead links, but the ongoing IBM page on the awards says: "This program recognizes IBM Collaboration Solutions Business Partners who have excelled in delivering exceptional business value" This feels like a walled-community award. Aside from that, while the company can be seen to be continuing in operation, I am not finding enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.