Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gennady Korotkevich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Per This wired article and This Belarusian TV report I have been persuaded that this article has a better chance of meeting the GNG then was evidenced during the AFD. I am therefore undeleting the article. Further discussion at AFD is at editorial discretion. Spartaz Humbug! 06:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Gennady Korotkevich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and fails to state a reason why notability should be presumed in lieu of sources under WP:ANYBIO. Sources offered are either WP:PRIMARY, the subject's own online profiles, or the non-notable results of various high school competitions. Googling turned up nothing. Additionally, though not a reason to delete, I note that virtual all the content has been contributed by a series of WP:SPAs, suggesting the article is an WP:Autobiography. Finally, I note that's been tagged as needing better sources for almost 2 years. Msnicki (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Sources are mainly results of competitions. No significant coverage (he's not even mentioned in all of them) and there's no indication that any of these events are important.204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * delete fails WP:BIO. Sources confirming awards are all primary. Needs some mainstream press to meet WP:BIO which is non evident. LibStar (talk) 11:24, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.