Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genomatix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Genomatix

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Proposing TNT. The article reads like an advertisement. Chance for improvement is very small. Probably not very useful as a good starting point for a rewrite. Janhrach (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Biology, Medicine,  and Technology. Janhrach (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Delete: I was able to find this, at least:, but that might be well-disguised churnalism, hard to tell. Same for this one: .  Everything else I found was either not independent or obvious press releases. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – WeirdNAnnoyed’s findings are helpful. The latter is definitely a press release due to the email tag at the bottom of the article. Other then that, per nom. TLA  (talk) 07:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.