Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genrobotics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Genrobotics

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

ET Source, HT, Theweek are about One of their product not the company, that too published by a not independent agency related to product launch, there is no independent news related to "Company". Product is not a company started by college students. All the other awards are non reliable and not helping in notability. Lordofhunter (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and India. Lordofhunter (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Kerala.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I agree, I'm unable to locate any references that aren't just regurgitated PR. I'm unable to find any in-depth "independent content", topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.