Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentleman B.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Gentleman B.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Part of a spamming campaign for non-notable and unreleased or flop films by the obscure Jordan Alan. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  23:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep Los Angeles Times, Variety and AllMovie are all reliable sources, and sources of high profile. The RottenTomatoes page shows the film was also reviewed by Emanuel Levy, The Hollywood Reporter (David Hunter) and New Times (Luke Y. Thompson). It sounds clearly notable to me. Cavarrone (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough coverage to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 08:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per this one meeting WP:NF and WP:GNG. Problems with actions of individual editors or groups are dealt with means other than deleting otherwise notable content. What is discernible as notable is kept and concerns with content or sourcing is addressed through regular editing.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * keep, enough evidence to be notable. --Shorthate (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.