Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentry Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Missvain (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Gentry Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMODEL, fails WP:BLP1E, poorly sourced and part of a mass creation of articles on pageant participents by a SOCK farm link and junk building effort. Legacypac (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Legacypac (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep as subject meets the verifiability and notability standards for WP:GNG. There is nothing in WP:NMODEL that specifies beauty pageant contestants and, in any case, it does not supersede WP:GNG. Notability is not temporary and the subject is covered by reliable third-party sources. Article was created in June 2007 by User:Pageantqueen87 who is neither a sockpuppet nor a junk builder. This nomination, however, is one of a growing series by this nominator in this topic all made about two minutes apart in the wake of a failed mass-nomination. My normal presumption of good faith is strained significantly. - Dravecky (talk) 12:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Update: I have found numerous references from reliable third-party sources published around the world for this subject and have used them to improve sourcing for this article. - Dravecky (talk) 12:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Good you provided some ROUTINE human interest stories and/or press release efforts. How is she notable again? Legacypac (talk) 12:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * She won the Miss Kansas Teen USA pageant then six years later won the Miss Kansas USA pageant, both of which garnered national and international recognition. These events are far from what's described in WP:ROUTINE. - Dravecky (talk) 13:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Sam Sing! 14:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * comment after I closed the group afd on the basis of likely unequal notability, I advised renominating individually a few at a time; renominating in very large groups the way these are being done is not a good idea, because it defeats the purpose of letting people have time to look for individual sources. (personally, though,  I think sufficient sources are likely to be found only when there is  a substantial subsequent career).  DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 19:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Dravecky "subject meets the verifiability and notability standards for WP:GNG." The references for the subject include three local and state newspapers, a television station, plus two international newspapers. As Dravecky has done here, I have researched numerous of the beauty pageant AFD subjects that this nominator put up in 2-3 minutes apart. I have easily found numerous verifiable reliable sources quite easily for every one I have researched by simply typing the names in google. It really strains my AGF to believe that the nominator followed WP:BEFORE before nominating all these batched articles for AFD.     WordSeventeen (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a WP:GNG pass per the research work done by Dravecky. Ejgreen77 (talk) 14:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.