Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geo-Faust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Geo-Faust
It's a page about random type of group copied from some random text file on the internet. Xiong Chiamiov  ::  contact  :: 00:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as totally unverifiable. --DarkAudit 00:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as totally pointless and unverifiable. Shadow1 01:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Um... no If it's "copied from some random text file on the internet", it may be copyvio. Show us the text file. I wont say delete till I see proof. But the page certainly is unverifiable, just as much as the nominator's reason. MichaelBillington 01:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. You misunderstand: The article says it was copied from some random text file. Fan-1967 01:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Sorry about the confusion. Fan-1967 is correct. Xiong Chiamiov   ::  contact  :: 01:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as unverifiable. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 05:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above Computerjoe 's talk 11:34, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete very strnage... Ch ild zy  ( Talk 12:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Copied or not, it's gibberish. — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   12:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Copied or not, it's gibberish. — Hex    (❝  ?!  ❞)   12:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per nom. Voice of Treason 14:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.