Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoSure Global


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

GeoSure Global

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam bombarded with press releases. Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. NBC News is a good start but by itself is not enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as classic example of a seemingly amply sourced article but this actually seems to be a newly founded company with only pieces of sources listed, none of this being enough for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given above. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.