Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geocentric Coordinates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. --King of All the Franks 19:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Geocentric Coordinates
I don't understand this in the least, and it's got to be covered somewhere else. King of All the Franks 15:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. --King of All the Franks 15:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Keep, since expanded. PJM 15:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is a useful article...now. Endomion 16:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep It's a notable concept in Astronomy. Certainly would be possible to merge it somewhere, but it merits its own article. PS I can see why the earlier version found its way onto Afd!   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - a notable concept. Could be improved, but quality and understandability are not basis for deletion. Laur 16:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable article. Ajwebb 17:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep and Speedy Keep - Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it should be deleted!! This is a very notable concept in astronomy.  Hell, it's one of the two main coordinate systems!  How anyone could possibly want to delete this is beyond me.  Bad faith nomination?  --Cyde Weys votetalk 19:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No bad faith, our coverage of the subject was really substandard, but it's much better now. I'll just need to move the page for Manual of Style purposes.  --King of All the Franks 19:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.