Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geodynamics Research International Bulletin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Geodynamics Research International Bulletin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article dePRODded by anonymous IP without reason given (but with simultaneous addition of lots of promotional material).Prod reason still stands: Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I was unable to find any significant independent coverage. Winner 42 Talk to me!  16:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. GeoRef is a well-respected index on the geosciences and reflects well upon the journal, but it strives to be comprehensive, so does not contribute to notability. As this is a fairly new journal, it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON, not enough time for indexing in selective databases to occur and an impact factor to be created. The journal is verifiable in GeoRef, but I don't see any good merge or redirect targets. I'm left with delete. --Mark viking (talk) 17:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.