Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Bunn

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:13, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

Geoff Bunn
Not notable. --fvw *  17:37, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC)

42 Google hits. I get way more than that. dbenbenn | talk

Delete/Redirect? My own article too! But ,yes, having reviewed the artists listed in Wikipedia I have to agree with the above. Sorry! (Newbie me!) But, having seen some of Bunn's stuff and so on, I wrote the article considering him/his work to be of sufficient interest. I wonder if there isn't scope for an Up-and-coming Artist(s) page or article? Or, as by definition, the names included would not yet be encyclopedic, would this be a non-starter. Any thoughts? Marcus22 This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, unless evidence of his notability is provided. dbenbenn | talk 18:36, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. jni 08:32, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Not notable. Unfound even :) Longhair 10:31, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. Bart133 (t) 02:14, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)