Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Mendicino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete per WP:COI and WP:BIO. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 00:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Geoff Mendicino

 * — (View AfD)

Vanity article. No independent, reliable, verifiable evidence of notability. Drat (Talk) 10:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If everybody who had over 2000 Google hits had a Wiki page, then I would have one as well.  There is no reason for this to continue to exist.--LordHuffNPuff 17:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep He is very notable and has many references in Google. Over 2000. User:IPTalk 12:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator also I think WP:COI applies as the author shares the same name. James086Talk 12:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - hopelessly nn internet celebrity, 992 ghits outside of myspace. MER-C 12:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete does not appear to meet WP:BIO. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non notable. - Cate |Talk 15:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Anomo 22:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This article and the subject fail to meet Notability_%28people%29:
 * The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person.
 * No one has written specifically about Geoff as far as I can tell other than a blog which is a trivial work
 * The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field.
 * No Geoff does not contribute enough to any field to be notable.
 * Political figures holding or who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.
 * No
 * Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage.5 Just being an elected local official does not guarantee notability.
 * No
 * Widely recognized entertainment personalities and opinion makers (e.g., - Hollywood Walk of Fame)
 * No, he is not hollywood walk of fame, nor is an e-personality who is verifiable like Lowtax.
 * Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, or at the highest level in mainly amateur sports or
 * No
 * Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Notability can be determined by:
 * No, just some mtv appearance which with gamelife.
 * Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work
 * No he has received no notable awards.
 * Painters, sculptors, architects, engineers, and other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field
 * No
 * Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events, such as by being assassinated.
 * No
 * Professor Test?
 * No
 * Verifiability
 * No
 * Expandability
 * Possibly
 * 100 year test?
 * No
 * Biography
 * No
 * Search Engine Test []
 * This about the only thing he comes close to passing but it is primarily his information and profiles.
 * As far as I can tell this person is not currently notable and there is not indication of notability in the future to warrant keeping the article. --Quirex 05:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.