Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Nutkins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Geoff Nutkins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be an aviation illustrator but despite some of the claims in the article I can't find anything at all about him anywhere online (discounting his website and his museum website) let alone significant coverage in reliable sources. The claim of raising money for charity is very worthy, but he produced over 6000 of these prints, so £100,000 doesn't indicate high value art. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete This source says "one of Britain’s top aviation artists Geoff Nutkins".. but then goes on to promote him in a way that reads like a press release. Not sure what guardian-series.co.uk is and found very little else (the NewsShopper sources are not independent). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ged  UK  13:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I do believe he's very talented, but, I'm struggling to find multiple reliable secondary sources. SarahStierch (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.