Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Swier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Geoff Swier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

associate assistant advisor to the something something something research unit key figure somehow unspecified blah blah nn Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:41, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: as non-notable political officeholder. Quis separabit?  14:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - I note the article needs ocnsiderable expansion and referencing but Swier has been a key player in privatisation reforms on both sides to the Tasman. With some work should easily fall within the notability guidelines NealeFamily (talk) 01:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Could you list the sources, I couldn't find much myself. Although, admittedly I don't know much about Geoff Swier.Jonpatterns (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete possibly he was around in the 1990s during the privatizations, as an adviser and somebody who was asked by the press to make short statements, but he fails WP:NPOL, he's now a lobbyist, ahem, consultant, operating far from the limelight, as can be gathered from some newspaper snippets, as to WP:GNG, if there WP:MUSTBESOURCES, then please show them, give us some links, NealeFamily. Kraxler (talk) 02:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.