Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey D. Falk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - the RS and concerns about the triviality of the citations pushes this over the line.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Geoffrey D. Falk


Contested prod. NN per WP:BIO, no WP:RS. Leibniz 10:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Completely fails to assert notability. Fails WP:BIO completely. The article itself is a puff piece. scope_creep 14:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per A7 Missvain 17:25, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Published author. Notable critic of popular new age writer Ken Wilber. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 20:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a notable published author per WP:BIO, no third-party coverage lnks. Sandstein 21:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons stated here - M Alan Kazlev 21:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Author is not notable. Kazlev above only gives citations which are not sourced or are trivial and refer only to the self-published output of author. There are no sourced references to the one published work. Author no longer recognises the published work anyway. --Oldface 18:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.