Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey W. Jackson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses.  Sandstein  21:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Geoffrey W. Jackson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, hasn't been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources Hack (talk) 15:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:52, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses. As I stated at the article's Talk page, this article is ostensibly a coatrack for Jackson's testimony at the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Pertinent information is already at Jehovah's Witnesses' handling of child sex abuse. Jackson otherwise fails the GNG.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Anthony Morris III also fails the GNG and should be redirected to Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses.-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses. Non notable except in relation to specific events (WP:NOTNEWS, fails WP:NBIO).  — Paleo  Neonate  – 03:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete This is a horribly POV-pushing article, clearly written by people who have no desire to include any consideration of the Jehovah's Witnesses views on being subjected to human governments into the text of the article, and intent on portraying what happened in Australia in the light that is most negative to Jackson.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Concerns about 'human governments' aside, would you have a problem with redirecting the article rather than deleting?-- Jeffro 77 (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.