Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geography in the Suikoden series (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite 22:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Geography in the Suikoden series
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails to meet the Wikipedia General Notability Guideline, since there are no reliable sources that can assert the notability of this article that are independent of the subject itself. Aggregating multiple non-notable topics into one mega-article still does not address our core WP:VERIFIABILITY policy that states: As stated by the closing admin "the flaws highlighted by the deleters do need fixing and, if the article is not improved in a reasonable time, say 3 months, then no objection could be taken to a further listing". This is a routine follow-up to help maintain Wikipedia's core standards. Randomran (talk) 01:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I'd love for this to be kept as a spinout article, but there really doesn't appear to be anything of note to anyone other than those seeking a game guide. -Verdatum (talk) 22:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — There are absolutely no verifiable sources for this. As put often, original research does not pay. The 1up.com review doesn't even give anything remotely establishing why the geography of Suikoden is notable. MuZemike (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per that it is really just a detailed game guide of geography not suitable for wikipedia. Salavat (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.