Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. If we mine deeper, precious sources become visible. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Geology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Geology and all related topics should be deleted immediately. Since the Earth is obviously fictional, articles about its internal processes are certainly fit for deletion. An Earth-specific wiki could perhaps cover this work of fiction, but Wikipedia covers real life, not such juvenile fantasies such as "Earth." While it may be fit to mention Earth due to the popularity of the "Earth" series, I see no reason that Wikipedia should carry such nonsense about small facets of fictional subjects. Editosaurus, lizard editor from outer space (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge to Planetary geology - I see no reason why this article is from an Earth perspective and gives too much focus on just one kind of planet. What about planets such as Mars or Jupiter? Their geology needs to be given importance too. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - grammar Nazi says "geo- means 'of the Earth'". Clearly planetary geology has got to go: keep only articles like selenology and areology. :) Chris857 (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.