Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geometric areas in space


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - patent nonsense. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Geometric areas in space

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Google doesn't know this term, only shows links to WP clones. Also the article doesn't contain any sources. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 13:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as unsalvageably incoherent. AlexTiefling (talk) 13:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even worth redirecting. Possibly a candidate for A1? Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Valid candidate for speedy G1. Or A1.  Take your pick, really.  This is archetypal patent nonsense: to the extent that there are even comprehensible elements in the text, one of them is counterfactual (the orbits of Uranus and Neptune do not cross). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and tagged it for CSD G1. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:35, 17 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.