Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Heidenreich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein after two relistings. North America1000 17:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Georg Heidenreich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's not clear that this individual is notable. Patents are not evidence of notability, and I see little content in this article to justify having an article on this person. Nothing is supported by references to reliable sources. The article appears to have been written by its subject. Srleffler (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find anything. This appears to be something of a common name - I found more stuff about an architect with this name, and also this one who is prominent in Australia.  —Мандичка YO 😜 04:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * {|cellpadding=0 style="border: 1px solid #A3A3A3; background-color: #FFFFFF" align=left width=auto


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. North America1000 10:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * }
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.