Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Burgess (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

George Burgess (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not at all convinced that this article meets notability criteria. This page and Gojimo have both been substansively written only by a single special-interest user with few other edits. There are a large number of articles sourced for each but I'm not sure that they actually prove notability in this case; I think the notable content is effectively covered in the Gojimo article. TorriderChimp (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment it appears to be a very promotional article --Devokewater @  11:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with this, but my understanding is that the (absolutely existent) problems with the tone of the article don't necessarily have a bearing on whether or not the article should be deleted. To be honest I strongly suspect that the article was written by the subject himself. TorriderChimp (talk) 11:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG, the sources don't seem all that great, I think quite a few are Twitter. May be WP:TOOSOON. EverybodyEdits (talk) 01:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:GNG fail. I've found more often than not, articles with the disambiguation "entrepreneur" generally tend to be pr pieces. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.