Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Caldwell (Louisiana)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) Antigng (talk) 09:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

George Caldwell (Louisiana)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Claim to fame is being a building contractor and being convicted of a crime related to the Louisiana Hayride scandal, which doesn't appear to be particularly notable. No evidence of in-depth, third-party WP:RS coverage. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep as satisfying WP:BASIC per the sources in the article, some of which I added after this was nominated. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 21:47, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ceradon ( talk  •  contribs ) 02:04, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Fully notable with sources. Declared notable by article in A Dictionary of Louisiana Biography by the Louisiana Historical Association. Billy Hathorn (talk) 15:11, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - good sourcing, per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.