Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Colby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mkdw talk 19:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

George Colby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Two six year old hoaxes! There isn't a single reliable source about either a privateer "George Colby" or his "Colby Pirates". The source that was added to the article, three years after creation,, is a copy of the Wikipedia article. (If deleted as hoaxes, they would be near the top of List of hoaxes on Wikipedia as being two of the hoaxes that survived the longest on here...). Fram (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Also nominated: Colby Pirates

Comment Best google books hit I could find referenced a Michael Colby in a production of Pirates of Penzance. There do seem to have been legitimate pirates on the Great Lakes ,though, so a little more investigation may be in order. 24.151.116.25 (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. 24.151.116.25 (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Piracy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete both as hoaxes. The deciding point for me was this early line from the articles' creator: "They were lead by George Colbywho was also known as Colonial Colonel Cheese Colby." . Make sure you get the entries in List of privateers and Template:Pirates too, aargh! 24.151.116.25 (talk) 23:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both as not having sufficient WP:Reliable Sources. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete both per Buckshot6. I couldn't find any assessment of the one book cited.  If it was important, we can find reliable sources and re-create it sometime later.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 18:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Suspicious is one thing, but I'm going to agree per above. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.