Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Craig (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

George Craig (musician)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. No vote. causa sui talk 07:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the band's article. There's not enough in available sources to build an article, thus the article fails WP:MUSICBIO. لenna  vecia  21:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. There are some sources written specifically about Craig as opposed to his band. This one talks about his modelling for Burberry, and there's a short interview for The Independent here. This article from the Daily Mail is about the band, but includes stuff about his private life as well. I think it meets "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable". Jafeluv (talk) 17:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, based on the reasonably good sources spotted by Jafeluv. Kudos for going the extra step and adding them to the article.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The subject's notability is almost completely tied to the band. (The reference above about his modeling goes very quickly into discussion about the band.) He has no notability outside of the band. In cases like this, it's best to merge this content to the band's article. ÷seresin 20:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Not great, but OK to have his own article. - Richfife (talk) 04:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.