Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George F. Graham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

George F. Graham

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-Notable Politician who fails WP:NPOL. This is a local level politician who's received local news coverage, but this individual has not held a high level office (i.e. state senate or above). Dusti*Let's talk!* 19:31, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable enough to need a wikipedia article. Also, "Gail", slap a surname on it, as I am pretty sure there is more than one "Gail" in the world, and they're not all married to this bloke. Cheesy McGee (talk) 13:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Officeholders at the county level of government are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — they can clear the inclusion bar if they can be sourced well enough to be credibly considered more notable than most other county councillors — namely, by showing coverage that nationalizes significantly beyond just what every county councillor can always show — but they are not handed an automatic inclusion freebie just because there are a couple of pieces of purely local media coverage of the election campaign itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2019
 * Delete Fails WP:NPOL - local politician who doesn't have broader recognition. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:32, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NPOL. --Tataral (talk) 14:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. --  Dane talk  02:18, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.