Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Gabet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I'm closing this as No consensus as opinion is evenly split and there has been no additional participation has come from the prior two relistings. Liz Read! Talk! 03:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

George Gabet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unclear whether this passes WP:N, and when combined with systematic issues of a poorly written page with the most of skeletal sources, deletion seems to be the best solution. Maximilian775 (talk) 22:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting again. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity,  and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Sourcing isn't stellar but I found enough to build up a short encyclopedic entry . However, the independence and reliability of these sources are sorta on the edge, so consider this a very, very weak keep from me. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep not sure how North American district superior ( US and Canada) equates to the role of a Bishop, possibly superior. Also reliable sources coverage has been identified above, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - The past head of Priestly Fraternity of Saint Peter, an organisation with a clerical membership of 542, does not seem to be to have an authority similar to a bishop. Examination of that article shows that the superiors-general have articles, but none of the current four district superiors do, which suggests to be that the position is not WP-notable.  Apart from this he appears to be a run-of-the-mill parish priest, no doubt a worthy man but NN.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage is mostly routine. The article in Today's Catholic is from his home town, and can't be considered independent. BruceThomson (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.