Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Getty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was: keep

George Getty
not sufficiently notable [[User:Consequencefree| Ardent &dagger; &isin; ]] 11:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete [[User:Consequencefree| Ardent &dagger; &isin; ]] 11:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

He is the start of a historial line (preceding comment by 195.137.71.61, the creator of the article under debate) --Ashenai (talk) 11:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Think it should stay as part of a project to clean up the Getty dynasty articles + flag for cleanup itself. --mervyn 12:30, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup This is the father of J. Paul Getty --Rogerd 19:07, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I would delete a notability by proxy article, but as part founder and owner of Getty Oil, he seems to be notable by himself. -- Kjkolb 03:26, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kjkolb -- though I agree that notability-by-proxy would not have been enough otherwise. --Jacquelyn Marie 23:10, 9 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.