Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Helmer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

George Helmer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was tagged for notability in 2011, and I still can find nothing online to say he's notable. Natureium (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Extraordinary claims require extraordinary sources. To show that Helmer "was influential" we would need mutiple sources. To show that this change in the law in Vermont was actually notable and significant, we would need sources supporting this view. We have only one, and it is not clear from the reference that Helmer gets much mention.03:27, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with 's statement on sourcing. And searches turned up virtually nothing to show Helmer passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:12, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.